I gotten 2666 adolescents (46.8%) belonging to the basic category (indicate age twelve.6 years; SD 0.89) and you can 3031 (53.2%) from the 2nd category (imply age fifteen.5 years; SD 0.90) .

Into the young classification, the new mean Body mass index is actually (SD 3.12), during older class Body mass index mean are (SD dos.75).

Males among them sample (n=2671), got a beneficial Body mass index indicate from 20.step 1 (SD 3.03), having a mean age of age (SD step 1.70), if you are ladies (n=3026), got an excellent Bmi imply out-of 20.dos (SD 2.95), which have a suggest chronilogical age of (SD 1.67) .

Body mass index, obese and you will carrying excess fat

Regarding the complete 5697 teenagers within the attempt, 89 (1.6%) was in fact classified just like the obese. There have been much more overweight females (51.7%) compared with people (forty-eight.3%). How many teens classified given that obese try 822 (14.4%). There had been significantly more over weight males (53.5%) compared with people (46.5%). Over weight was more widespread certainly people than simply among ladies [? 2 (1)=; P dos (1)=; P 2 (1)=; P table step three).

Exercise

Discover a positive change between overweight and you will low-obese (n=5566; t=1.977; P dos (1)=0.565; P=0.452] and you can obese [? dos (1)=0.687; P=0.407] teenagers, compared with the rest of the test.

Losing weight conduct

Certain (eight.3%) regarding teenagers stated being with the eating plan so you can slim down, when you are 22.3% said not-being towards the diet but that they necessary to lose pounds. Girls stated weightloss more guys (twenty-five.3% regarding men and you may 74.7% from lady) [? 2 (1)=; P dos (2)=; P dos (1)=; P dos (1)=; P 2 (1)=0.625; P=0.429]. However, there was a statistically factor involving the number of romantic family unit members and you can fat: 75% of non-obese said which have 2 or more family members and you will 71.2% off obese [? dos (1)=5.24; P=0.022].

In search of brand new relatives

Some 87.7% of your own young ones claimed it being no problem finding this new relatives. It absolutely was more difficult and also make family both for over weight [? 2 (1)=; P 2 (1)=; P 2 (1)=; P 2 (3)=; P 2 (3)=; P dos (3)=; P sixteen ). The seven-point size was classified into the about three organizations (slim, average and heavy). A small grouping of 254 kids (4.7%) experienced themselves ‘thin’; of those, 67.3% was in fact lady, 85.4% belonged into earlier class and 98.8% experienced on their own given that not-being obese. All of them sensed themselves while the not-being obese. From the group who considered themselves ‘average’, 4948 youngsters (90.8%) was basically included; of them, 53.7% had been female, 53.0% belonged toward earlier classification, 87.7% believed by themselves because not being overweight and you will 99.1% sensed on their own due to the fact not being heavy. From the category who thought on their own ‘overweight’, 250 young ones (4.6%) was basically incorporated; of these, 59.6% was indeed women, sixty.4% fall under young class, 68% sensed by themselves as being overweight and sixteen.8% thought on their own as actually heavy. The brand new indicate Bmi of those exactly who identified on their own due to the fact narrow on the picture try (SD 2.14), regarding mediocre groups is actually (SD dos.78), and also at this new fat group try (SD 3.84).

One-means ANOVA and you will Scheffe’s post hoc decide to try of these classes inside the new perception away from human anatomy visualize (thin, average or obese) showed statistically tall variations in Body mass index [F(dos,5449)=; P 2 (1)=391.1; P=0.000].

This exact same one to-way ANOVA and you will Scheffe’s post hoc take to of these categories within the perception off system visualize (slim, average or obese) and additionally demonstrated statistically high variations getting age. The greater regular character of a beneficial overweight picture while the the same as very own shape is way more repeated for the more youthful kids [F(2,5449)=; P dos =0.349). All these details were notably for the seen looks visualize, but gender. Body mass index, eating plan behavior and you may looks had been positively related. Age is actually adversely relevant ( desk 4).